The corresponding or submitting author submits the paper to conference.
2). Initial Assessment
The Editorial Office checks the paper's composition and arrangement to make sure it includes the required sections and stylizations. At the Same time the article is passed through plagiarism check. If it passes the step then it will transfer to Peer Reviewers of the relevant field for the Evaluation. Otherwise, it will be rejected directly.
3). Review is Conducted
The peer reviewer sets time aside to read the paper several times. The first read is used to form an initial impression of the work. If major problems are found at this stage, the reviewer may will reject the paper without further work. Otherwise they will read the paper several more times, taking notes so as to build a detailed point-by-point review. The review is then submitted to the journal, with a recommendation to accept or reject it.
4). Editor Evaluates the Reviews
The editor considers all the returned reviews before making an overall decision. If the reviews differ widely, the editor may invite an additional reviewer so as to get an extra opinion before making a decision.
5). Review Report Communicated
If the paper need to be revised, the conference seceretary will communicate with the author via Email. And seceretary will mention the time period given to the Author to resend the revised manuscript as per comments.
6). Final review and Notification
During this process, revised manuscript sent to editing team again. Whether the article is accepted or rejected, the conference secretary will inform the author by email by the notification deadline.